VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

E.Sivaraman v. The State of Tamilnadu

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
22 April 2026
Bench
S Justice L.Victoria Gowriauthor
Case no.
WP Crl.(MD) 2351/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow S Justice L.Victoria Gowri

Judgment

ORDER Seeking to direct the respondents 2 and five to take necessary action and to provide adequate police protection for the peaceful conduct of Sri Vinayakar, Sri Bhagavathi Amman, Sri Mariaman, Sri Muthalamman, Sri Kaliamman Urchava Vizha scheduled to be conducted from 24.05.2026 to 28.05.2026 at P.Kosavapatti, Padiyur, Vedasanthur Taluk, Dindigul District based on the representation made by the petitioner dated 17.04.2026, this writ petition is filed.

¶2Considering the limited scope of the relief sought for, notice to the private respondents is dispensed with.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the 6th and 7th respondents are restraining the petitioner's family and relatives from participating in the temple festival mentioned supra. In this regard, he sought for the indulgence of the 5th respondent police to afford necessary police protection for the peaceful participation of the petitioner and group.

¶4Heard the learned counsel on either side and carefully perused the materials available on record.

¶5The 3rd respondent is directed to conduct a peace committee on

06.05.2026. It is made clear that the 3rd respondent will put the petitioner as well as 6th and 7th respondents on notice and also all necessary parties related to the said temple. The petitioner is permitted to appear before the 3rd respondent and ventilate his plight. After giving opportunity of hearing to the rival parties, the 3rd respondent is directed to facilitate the conduct of the temple festival and make sure that none of the persons, including the petitioner and his relatives being prevented from participating in the said temple festival. On obtaining such a resolution, the 5th respondent police is directed to afford necessary police protection for the proper conduct of the temple festival.

¶6With the above directions, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.

22.04.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No gbg Note: Issue order copy on 24.04.2026. TO:-

1.The District Collector, Dindigul.

2.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Palani Revenue Division, Palani,

4.The Tahsildar, Vedasanthur Taluk,

5.The Inspector of Police, Vadamadurai Police Station,

6.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai

L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J. gbg Dated

22.04.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 22.04.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI E.Sivaraman ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Dindigul. 2.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Palani Revenue Division, Palani, 4.The Tahsildar, Vedasanthur Taluk, 5.The Inspector of Police, Vadamadurai Police Station, 6.Krishnamoorthy 7.M.Kalimuthu ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd and 5th respondents to take necessary action and to provide adequate police protection for the peaceful conduct of Sri Vinayakar, Sri Bhagavathi Amman, Sri Mariaman, Sri Muthalamman, Sri Kaliamman Urchava Vizha scheduled to be conducted from 24.05.2026 to 28.05.2026 at P.Kosavapatti, Padiyur, Vedasanthur Taluk, Dindigul District based on the representation made by the petitioner dated 17.04.2026. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Vijayarajan For Respondents : Mr.S.Ravi (R2 & R5) Additional Public Prosecutor Mr.C.Satheesh (R1, R3 & R4) Government Advocate(civil)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.