Sangavi v. The Inspector of Police

ORDER Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after filing the present petition only, he knows that the petitioner's name is not found in the FIR.

¶2The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police also confirmed the above said submission.

¶3In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as unnecessary. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

12.06.2023 NCC : Index : Internet : tta To

¶1Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Ramanathapuram District.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN,J tta Dated: 12.06.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.06.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.10192 of 2023 and Crl.M.P(MD).No.8095 of 2023 Sangavi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.State through the Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Ramanathapuram District. 2.M.Ganesan ... Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records pertaining to the First Information Report in Crime No.25/2021 died 06.07.2021 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same as illegal. For Petitioner : Mr.C.M.Arumugam For R1 : Mr.B.Nambiselvan Additional Public Prosecutor