- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 14 August 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- CONT P(MD) 1123/2023
Judgment
O R D E R Heard both sides.
2.This Court vide order dated 19.01.2023 in W.P.(MD)No.27983 of 2022 directed the District Revenue Officer, Dindigul to dispose of his representation dated 01.11.2022. I made it clear that without going into the merits of the matter, I am directing the District Revenue Officer, Dindigul to pass final order. The District Revenue Officer, Dindigul passed an order dated 26.07.2023 rejecting the petitioner's request. The petitioner has to necessarily question the same in the manner known to law.
3.With this liberty to the petitioner, this contempt petition is closed.
14.08.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias To:- Latha, The District Revenue Officer, O/o. District Revenue Officer, Collectorate, Dindigul – 624 004.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ias Cont.P.(MD)No.1123 of 2023 in W.P.(MD)No.27983 of 2022
14.08.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 14.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Cont.P.(MD)No.1123 of 2023 in W.P.(MD)No.27983 of 2022 M.Shanmugasundaran ... Petitioner Vs. Latha, The District Revenue Officer, O/o. District Revenue Officer, Collectorate, Dindigul – 624 004. ... Respondent Prayer: Contempt petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the contemnor / 2nd respondent for her wilful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in WP(MD).No.27983 of 2022 dated 19.01.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Sheik Abdullah For Respondent : Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar, Addl. Government Pleader.
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.