VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Durgalakshmi v. The Commissioner

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
12 September 2023
Bench
B.Pugalendhiauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 14207/2022

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner, apprehending that the respondent Corporation is attempting to demolish the building adjacent to her house, has filed this writ petition for a mandamus directing the respondent not to demolish and construct a new house in S.No.618 and 613/2 situated at Kavadakara Street, Railway Station Road, Dindigul District.

2.Learned Counsel appearing for the respondent Corporation submitted that the petitioner's apprehension is unwarranted and that as on date, they are not having any inclination to demolish the building.

3.Recording the submission made by the learned Counsel for the respondent Corporation, this writ petition is closed. No costs. Index :

12.09.2023 NCC : Internet : gk To The Commissioner, Dindigul Corporation, Dindigul District.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. gk

12.09.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 12.09.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Durgalakshmi .. Petitioner v. The Commissioner, Dindigul Corporation, Dindigul District. .. Respondent Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent not to issue approval for demolishing and constructing a new house in S.No.618 and 613/2 situated at Kavadakara Street, Railway Station Road, Dindigul District. For Petitioner : Ms.V.Karuna For Respondent : Mr.M.Thirunavukkarasu *****

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.