- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 28 July 2023
- Bench
- S Justice S.Srimathy
- Case no.
- CONT P(MD) 1064/2023
Judgment
O R D E R When the contempt petition was taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the contemnor submitted that the order passed by this Court is complied with.
2.Recording the said submission, the contempt petition is closed. No costs. Index : Yes / No
28.07.2023 Internet : Yes Tmg S.SRIMATHY, J
Tmg
28.07.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 28.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY V.John Rose ... Petitioner vs. K.Elangovan, Managing Director, State Express Transport Corporation (TN) Limited, Thiruvalluvar Illam, Pallavan Salai, Chennai-600 002. ... Contemnor PRAYER: Petition filed under under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971, to punish the respondent for wilfully disobeying and not complying with the order of this Court, dated 23.09.2022, in W.P.(MD)No.18768 of 2017. For Petitioner : Mr.A.K.Thangavelu For Contemnor : Mr.K.Senthil Kumar
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.