VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Thamilarasi v. The Inspector of Police

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
22 November 2023
Bench
G.Ilangovanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 12088/2022

Judgment

ORDER This criminal original petition has been filed seeking direction to the 1st and 2nd respondents police not to harass the petitioner on the guise of enquiry except through due process of law.

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the fourth respondent has falsely foisted this case against the petitioner.

3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that after completing the investigation in this Crime No.154 of 2022, final report was filed before the concerned Court. Now the petitioner awaiting summons from the concerned trial Court. Hence, nothing survives for further consideration in this case. She has to appear before the trial Court and face the trial process.

4.This criminal original petition is dismissed as infructuous.

22.11.2023 NCC : Index : Internet : TM To

1.The Inspector of Police, Thiruverumbur Police Station, NH 67, Ancillary Colony, Thiruverumbur, Trichy 620 013.

2.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Subramaniapuram, Trichy -20 Crime No. Not known/2022.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN

,J.

TM

22.11.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 22.11.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Thamilarasi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Inspector of Police, Thiruverumbur Police Station, NH 67, Ancillary Colony, Thiruverumbur, Trichy 620 013. 2.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Subramaniapuram, Trichy -20 Crime No. Not known/2022. 3.The Branch Manager, UCO Bank, Dindigul Main Road, Navalur Kuttapattu, Vanan Kovil, Trichy 620 009. 4.Arulmozhidevan 5.Savithri 6.A.Leema ...Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to direct the 1st and 2nd respondents police not to harass the petitioner on the guise of enquiry except through due process of law. For Petitioner : Mrs.M.Rajeswari For R1 & R2 : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.