VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

S.Karthick v. The Chairman

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
7 June 2023
Bench
R. Subramanianauthor, S Justice L.Victoria Gowri
Case no.
WP(MD) 13144/2023

Judgment

O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.] The complaint filed by the second respondent before the State Human Rights Commission is under challenge in this writ petition. The only ground urged is that the State Human Rights Commission has no jurisdiction to entertain the said complaint.

¶2It is open to the petitioner to raise the issue of jurisdiction before the State Human Rights Commission itself. Article 226 of the Constitution of India cannot be used to scuttle the enquiries. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

[R.S.M., J.] [L.V.G., J.]

07.06.2023 NCC : Index : Internet :

krk R.SUBRAMANIAN , J . and L.VICTORIA GOWRI , J . krk and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.11120 & 11121 of 2023

07.06.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 07.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.11120 & 11121 of 2023 S.Karthick ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The Chairman The State Human Rights Commission Tamil Nadu "Thiruvarangam" No.143, P.S.Kumarasamy Raja Salai (Greenways Road) Chennai-600 028 2.T.Praveen Kumar ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of certiorari by calling for the entire records pertaining to the case in S.H.R.C.No.4871 of 2020 pending on the file of the first respondent and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Anand

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.