Subbiah.M v. The Additional Chief Secretary / Commissioner of Revenue Administration

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶2The entire case of the petitioner proceeds on the premise that the third respondent herein was originally appointed in Group-IV post. Factually, it is not so. The third respondent was only appointed in Group-II post. A similar writ petition was dismissed by this Court yesterday in W.P.(MD)No.8267 of 2023.

¶3The Writ Petition is also dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

07.06.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To

1.The Additional Chief Secretary / Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Revenue Administration and Disaster Management, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005.

2.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

07.06.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 07.06.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.11155 & 11158 of 2023 M.Subbiah ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Additional Chief Secretary / Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Revenue Administration and Disaster Management, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005. 2.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. 3.Sanjeev Nathan, Assistant Section Officer, General Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned proceedings Na.Ka.No.Pani. 3(1)/190190/354/2023, dated 09.03.2023 passed by the first respondent with respect to the third respondent to the 2nd respondent Madurai District and quash the same portion pertaining to 3rd respondent alone as null and void and thereby directing the 1st respondent to allot the supernumerary post as contemplated in the current G.O.(1D)No.46, dated 12.02.2019 of Revenue and Disaster Management Department sent back those persons to their parent department after completion of training on the second respondent Madurai District. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Jothi Basu For Respondent : Mr.N.Ramesh Arumugam Government Advocate for R1 & R2 : Mr.T.Antony Arulraj for R3