- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 17 August 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 14349/2022
Judgment
ORDER When the writ petition is taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel appearing for petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement so.
2.Recording the above submission and the endorsement, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.
17.08.2023 Internet : Yes / No To
1.The District Collector, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.
2.The Block Development Officer, Manur Police Station, Tirunelveli District.
B.PUGALENDHI, J. dsk
17.08.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated: 17.08.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and WMP(MD)No.10253 of 2022 Subbu ... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli. 2.The Block Development Officer, Manur Police Station, Tirunelveli District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ of mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to extend the period of lease of fishery right for the period of 3 months in favour of the petitioner in Pettaikulam Tank situated within the jurisdiction of Manur Panchayat Union, Tirunelveli District. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Anand For Respondents : Mr.M.Sarangam, Additional Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.