VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Jitendra Kumar S.Jain v. The Tahsildhar

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
20 November 2023
Bench
N. Anand Venkateshauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 15292/2021

Judgment

O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to consider the representations made by the petitioner who is seeking for restoration of patta with respect to the subject property.

¶2When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Government Pleader submitted the written instructions received from the first respondent. The relevant portions in the written instructions are extracted hereunder: W.P.(MD)No.15292oofo2021 "bfhilf;fhdy; tl;lk; kw;Wk; efuk;> thh;L-o> gpshf;-20> o.v];.vz;.57-y; tp];jPuzk; 0.33.00 b?f;nlh;epykhdJ epy clik nkk;ghl;Lj;jpl;l "m"gjpntl;oy; njtrfhak; kf;fs; me;njhzp-1 kw;Wk; me;njhzpak;khs;-2 Mfpnahh; bgaupy; gl;lhthf jhf;fyhfpa[s;sJ. thjp jpU.milf;fyjh]; vd;gtupd; kidtpapd; jhahh; me;njhzpak;khs; vd;gtUk; me;njhzpak;khspd; rnfhjuh; me;njhzp vd;gtUk; ,we;jgpd;dh; jpU.milf;fyjh]; vd;gtupd; kidtp rnuh$h kw;Wk; K:d;W egh;fs; mDgtpj;J te;jjhft[k; nkw;go epykhdJ jhH;j;jg;gl;nlhh; kw;Wk; gHq;FoapdUf;fhd gQ;rkh; fz;ord;go tHq;fg;gl;l gl;lh epyk; vd;Wk;> nkw;go g[yj;ij jpU.$pnje;jpuf;Fkhh; j/bg.rhe;jpyhy; b$apd; vd;gth; jdJ kidtpia Vkhw;wp nkhroahf fpiuak; bgw;W mtuJ bgaupy; gl;lh khWjy; bra;Js;shh; vd;Wk;> nkw;go gl;lh khWjiy uj;J bra;anfl;Lk; jpU.milf;fyjh]; vd;gth; bfhilf;fhdy; tUtha; nfhl;lhl;rpauplk; kD bra;jjpd;ngupy; bfhilf;fhdy; tUtha; nfhl;lhl;rpah; mth;fshy; ghh;it 1-y ; fhZk; Fwpg;gpd;go nkw;fz;l epykhdJ epykw;w ViHfs;> jhH;j;jg;gl;nlhh; kw;Wk; gHq;Foapdh;fSf;F tptrhak; bra;a[k;bghUl;L tHq;fg;gl;l xg;gil epyj;jpid tUtha; nfhl;lhl;rpah; Kd; mDkjp ,y;yhky; tpw;gid bra;jJ tpjpkPwy; vd fz;lwpag;gl;ljhy; $pnje;jpuf;Fkhh; v];.b$apd; vd;gth; bgahpy; bra;ag;gl;Ls;s gl;lh khWjy; cj;jut[ uj;J bra;J cj;jutplg;gl;Ls;sJ. mjd;ngupy; nkw;fz;l bfhilf;fhdy; tl;lk; kw;Wk; efuk;> thh;L-o> gpshf;-20> v.v];.vz;.57-y; cs;s 0.33.00 Vh;]; epyk; jw;nghJ jPh;it Vw;gl;l jhpR vd fpuhk fzf;Ffspy; jhf;fy; bra;ag;gl;Ls;sJ. ,e;neh;tpy;> bfhilf;fhdy; tl;lk; kw;Wk; efuk;> thh;L-o> gpshf;-20> o.v];.vz;.57-y; tp];jPuzk; 0.33.00 b +f;nlh; epyk; bfhilf;fhdy; tUtha;f; nfhl;lhl;rpauhy; uj;J bra;J Mizaplg;gl;lij Ml;nrgpj;J jpU.$pnje;jpuf;Fkhh; vd;gtuhy; jpz;Lf;fy; khtl;l tUtha; mYtyh; mth;fsplk; nky;KiwaPL bra;ag;gl;L jw;nghJ jpz;Lf;fy; khtl;l tUtha; mYtyh; mth;fspd; tprhuizapy; cs;sJ. jhth g[yk; bjhlh;ghf jpz;Lf;fy; khtl;l tUtha; mYtyh; mth;fspd; tprhuizapy; cs;sJ."

¶3The order passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Kodaikanal, dated

14.02.2018 was also placed before this Court.

¶4In view of the above, it is left open to the petitioner to work out his remedy in the pending appeal before the District Revenue Officer, Dindigul.

¶5This Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

20.11.2023 NCC:yes/no Index:yes/no Internet:yes/no Nsr To

1.The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Taluk Office Road, Begambur, Dindigul – 624 001.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, New Agraharam, Karunanidhi Nagar, Dindigul District – 624 001.

3.The District Registrar, Office of the District Registrar, No.7/35, Gandhipuram Round Road, Dindigul Railway Station, Dindigul – 624 003.

4.The Sub Registrar, Office of the Sub Registrar, 111/15, Taluk Office Campus, Kodaikanal – 624 101.

N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. Nsr

20.11.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH Jitendra Kumar S.Jain ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Tahsildar, O/o. Tahsildar, Taluk Office Road, Begambur, Dindigul – 624 001. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o. The Revenue Divisional Officer, New Agraharam, Karunanidhi Nagar, Dindigul District – 624 001. 3.The District Registrar, O/o. The District Registrar, No.7/35, Gandhipuram Round Road, Dindigul Railway Station, Dindigul – 624 003. 4.The Sub Registrar, O/o. The Sub Registrar, 111/15, Taluk Office Campus, Kodaikanal – 624 101. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to consider the representations dated 19.04.2021 and 28.06.2021 for restoration of patta in respect of the property measuring an extent of 33 ares, equivalent to 82 cents, situated at Ward D Kodaikanal Town, Kodaikanal Taluk comprised in Survey No.57, morefully described in the schedule to the petition and pass suitable favourable orders within a time frame that may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Ms.E.Gomathi For Respondents : Mr.K.S.Selva Ganesan, Additional Government Pleader

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.