- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 8 June 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 13354/2023
Judgment
ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.
2.The petitioner is presently working as Administrative Supervisor in the office of the third respondent. According to him, he must be promoted as Assistant Administrative Officer. The petitioner is due to retire on 30.06.2023. He has given a representation recently demanding he should be promoted. The second respondent is directed to endeavor to pass order on the petitioner's representation before the petitioner reaches the age of superannuation. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter.
3.This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.
08.06.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias Issue order copy on 09.06.2023.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ias
08.06.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 08.06.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN T.A.Kannan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Chairman and Managing Director, TANGEDCO, No.144, Anna Salai, Chenani. 2.The Chief Engineer (Personnel), TANGEDCO, No.144, Anna Salai, Chenani. 3.The Chief Engineer / Distribution, TANGEDCO, Trichy. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner representation dated 29.05.2023 and further consider the promotion to the post of Assistant Administrative Officer prior to his retirement date 30.06.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.AL.Kannan For Respondents : Mrs.M.Parameswari, Standing Counsel.
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.