VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Thangappan.P v. The Managing Director

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
9 June 2023
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 13460/2023

Judgment

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶2The writ petitioner was working as a Special Grade Conductor in the respondent Corporation. He retired on 31.07.2021. However, his terminal benefits were settled only on 29.03.2023. It is well settled that for such belated settlement, the retired employee is entitled to interest. I therefore direct the respondent Corporation to pay interest to the writ petitioner computed at the rate of 6% per annum on the belated disbursement from the date of retirement till date of settlement. The interest amount shall be paid within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶3This writ petition is allowed accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.

09.06.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No MGA To

1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Tirunelveli) Ltd., 23/2, Kattaboman Nagar, Tirunelveli – 627 011.

2.The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Employees' Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar House, Pallavan Salai, Chennai – 600 002.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA

09.06.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 09.06.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN P.Thangappan ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Tirunelveli) Ltd., 23/2, Kattaboman Nagar, Tirunelveli – 627 011. 2.The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Employees' Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar House, Pallavan Salai, Chennai – 600 002. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to pay the interest at the rate of 6% per annum to the petitioner, for the belated payment of Gratuity, Provident fund and Pension commutation from the date of retirement to the date of actual payment. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Thangamani For Respondents : Mr.D.Jebaraj Standing Counsel for R.1 Mr.S.C.Herold Singh Standing Counsel for R.2

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.