P.Nandakumar v. The Superintendent of Police

ORDER This criminal original petition has been filed seeking direction to the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner at the investigation of 3rd respondent.

2.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the third respondent enquiry is undertaken. During the course of enquiry, this petitioner also appeared and stated that it is money issue between them and they will workout their remedy through appropriate civil process. Hence, the complaint has been closed. Therefore, nothing survives for further consideration in this case.

3.Accordingly, this petition stands dismissed as infructuous.

22.11.2023 NCC : Index : Internet : TM To

1.The Superintendent of Police, Theni, Theni District.

2.The State: Rep.by Sub Inspector of Police, Vaigaidam Police Station, Andipatty, Theni District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN

,J.

TM

22.11.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 22.11.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN P.Nandakumar ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Theni, Theni District. 2.The State: Rep.by Sub Inspector of Police, Vaigaidam Police Station, Andipatty, Theni District. 3.G.Periyasamy ...Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to direct the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner at the investigation of 3rd respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Suriyanarayanan For R1 & R2 : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.side)