- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 12 July 2023
- Bench
- S.S. Sundar, D.Bharatha Chakravarthy
- Case no.
- WA(MD) 1035/2023
Judgment
J U D G M E N T [Judgment of the Court was made by S.S.SUNDAR, J.] This writ appeal is directed against the order of the learned Single Judge, dated 06.06.2022, passed in W.P.(MD) No.9179 of 2022.
¶2The appellant's father worked as a Government Teacher for more than 33 years and retired from service in the year 1994. It is also admitted by the appellant that his father was receiving pension. It is the case of the appellant that on 14.09.2010, his father, while he was sleeping in his house, was bitten by a poisonous snake and that his father died, despite he was taken to the Government Hospital for treatment. This incident is reported in Crime No.179 of 2010, under Section 174 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, on the file of Elumalai Police Station. It is not in dispute that the appellant's father died due to snake bite. The appellant's representation to the Tahsildar, Peraiyur Taluk, was rejected even in the year 2011. However, by giving subsequent representations from the year 2015, the appellant approached this Court by filing a writ petition in W.P.(MD) No.9179 of 2022 for a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to provide compensation under G.O.(D) No.160, Environment, Climate Change and Forests (FR.5) Department, dated 03.11.2021, for the death of his father due to snake bite. Since the appellant's representation was rejected by the Tahsildar, Peraiyur Taluk, way back in the year 2011 and the writ petition was filed only in the year 2022, the learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition solely on the ground of delay and laches.
¶3The appellant cannot take advantage of the subsequent representations and then, approach this Court with a grievance that his representation is not considered. Having suffered an adverse order in the year 2011, the appellant did not bother to challenge the same within a reasonable time. Hence, this Court finds no ground to interfere with the order passed by the learned Single Judge.
¶4Accordingly, this writ appeal fails and it is dismissed. No costs.
[S.S.S.R., J.] [D.B.C., J.]
12.07.2023 NCC : Index : Internet :
krk To:
1.The Secretary, The Revenue and Disaster Management Department, The State of Tamil Nadu, Fort St.George, Chennai.
2.The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Madurai.
3.The Tahsildar, Peraiyur Taluk, Peraiyur, Madurai District. S.S.SUNDAR , J . and D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY , J . krk
12.07.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 12.07.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY B.Balamurgan ... Appellant -vs- 1.The State of Tamil Nadu rep.by its Secretary The Revenue and Disaster Management Department The State of Tamil Nadu Fort St.George, Chennai 2.The District Collector Office of the District Collector Madurai 3.The Tahsildar Peraiyur Taluk Peraiyur Madurai District ... Respondents Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to set aside the order, dated 06.06.2022, passed in W.P.(MD) No.9179 of 2022, on the file of this Court. For Appellant : Mr.R.Alagumani For Respondents : Mr.J.Ashok Additional Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.