VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

A.Maria Selvam v. The Secretary,

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
25 June 2026
Bench
D.Bharatha Chakravarthyauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 13083/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow D.Bharatha Chakravarthy

Judgment

ORDER This Writ Petition challenges the impugned refusal check slip, whereby the document presented by the petitioner for registration was refused on the ground that the original parent document, referred to and relied upon in the instrument presented for registration, had not been produced and that no non-traceable certificate had been furnished.

¶2The said refusal is founded upon Section 34-C of the Registration Act, 1908, as inserted by Tamil Nadu Act 1 of 2026.

¶3By order dated 23.06.2026 in M/s.Dugars, represented by its Partner v. State of Tamil Nadu and Others [W.P.(MD) No.7415 of 2026 etc., batch], Section 34-C of the Registration Act, 1908, has already been declared unconstitutional. Page No. 2 of 5

¶4In view of the aforesaid judgment, the legal position that prevailed prior to the insertion of Section 34-C would govern the present case. Consequently, the production of a certified copy of the parent document would suffice for the purpose of registration and the registering authority is bound to consider the same in accordance with law.

¶5Accordingly, this Writ Petition is allowed on the following terms:

(i) The impugned refusal check slip is set aside. The petitioner is permitted to re-present the document for registration along with a certified copy of the parent document. Upon such presentation, the registering authority shall process the document and complete the registration, if it is otherwise in order and if there exists no other legal impediment.

(ii) There shall be no order as to costs. NCC : No

25.06.2026 smn2 To

1.The Secretary, Department of Registration and Commercial Taxes, State of Tamil Nadu, Chennai. Page No. 3 of 5

2.The Inspector General of Registration, Department of Registration, Chennai.

3.The District Registrar, Office of the District Registrar, Thoothukudi District.

4.The Sub Registrar, Sathankulam, Thoothukudi District. Page No. 4 of 5 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY

, J.

smn2

25.06.2026 Page No. 5 of 5

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 25.06.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.(MD)No.13083 of 2026 A.Maria Selvam ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Secretary, Department of Registration and Commercial Taxes, State of Tamil Nadu, Chennai. 2.The Inspector General of Registration, Department of Registration, Chennai. 3.The District Registrar, Office of the District Registrar, Thoothukudi District. 4.The Sub Registrar, Sathankulam, Thoothukudi District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certioarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the impugned refusal Check slip in RFL/Sathankulam/28/2026 dated 17.04.2026 issued by the fourth respondent herein and quash the same as illegal and further direct the fourth respondent herein to register and release the subject mentioned settlement deed dated 17.04.2026 without insisting for the production of the original Parent title deed in Document Page No. 1 of 5 No.142/2021 (Sathankulam) and complete the registration process within a time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Meenakshi Sundaram For Respondents : Ms.P.Sudarkodi Nachiar Government Standing Counsel

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.