- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 6 November 2023
- Bench
- N. Anand Venkatesh
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 15168/2021
Judgment
O R D E R The Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the matter has become infructuous.
¶2Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
06.11.2023 NCC:yes/no Index:yes/no Internet:yes/no tsg To
1.The District Collector, O/o. District Collector, Tuticorin District.
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o. Revenue Divisional, Tiruchendur Taluk, Tuticorin District.
3.The Tahsildar O/o. Taluk Office, Tiruchendur Taluk, Tuticorin District.
N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. tsg
06.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH S.Shanmugakani ... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector, O/o. District Collector, Tuticorin District. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o. Revenue Divisional, Tiruchendur Taluk, Tuticorin District. 3.The Tahsildar O/o. Taluk Office, Tiruchendur Taluk, Tuticorin District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to issue the separate patta for house property in Survey No.241/1 and now as new survey in 1522/53 measuring an extent of 4.54 cents was situated in East Tiruchendur Village, Tiruchendur Taluk, Tuticorin District, on the basis of the petitioner's representations dated 25.05.2018 and 18.06.2019 within the stipulated time period that may be fixed by this court For Petitioner : Mr.Niranjan S.Kumar For R-1 to R-3 : Ms.D.Farjana Ghoushia, Special Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.