- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 26 June 2023
- Bench
- G.Ilangovan
- Case no.
- CRL OP(MD) 12523/2022
Judgment
O RDER
This petition has been filed seeking to quash the impugned FIR in Crime No. 105 of 2015 on the file of the 1st respondent police.
2.The contention of the petitioners is that based on the complaint lodged by the 2nd respondent, the 1st respondent registered the First Information Report in Crime No.105 of 2015 for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 341, 294(b), 326, 326, 355, 307 of IPC, against the petitioners. Seeking quashment of the same on various grounds this petition has been filed.
3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that after completing the investigation, final report was presented before the concerned Court, and the same was taken on file in P.R.C.No.10 of 2023.
4.In view of the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, the prayer sought for in this petition has become infructuous.
5.Accordingly, this criminal original petition stands dismissed as infructuous.
26.06.2023
NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No TM To
¶1The State represented by The Inspector of Police, Madhagupatty Police Station, Sivagangai District.
2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN. J. TM Crl.O.P.(MD) No.12523 of 2022
26.06.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 26.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Crl.O.P.(MD) No.12523 of 2022 1. Bose @ Balakrishnan, 2. Subramani, 3. Senthilkumar, 4. Ramaiah, 5. Thavamani, 6. Latha, 7. Amutha, ...Petitioners/ Accused 1 to 7 Vs. 1.The State represented by The Inspector of Police, Madhagupatty Police Station, Sivagangai District. ... 1st Respondent/ Complainant 2. Sivaramakrishnan, ... 2nd Respondent/ Defacto Complainant PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to call for the records pertaining to FIR in crim no.105 of 2015 dated 03.05.2015 on the file of the Respondent police and quash the same as illegal. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Benazir Begum For Respondents : Mr.B.Nambiselvan Additional Public Prosecutor for R.1
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.