VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Ranjith v. The Inspector of Police

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
12 June 2023
Bench
G.K. Ilanthiraiyanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 10237/2023

Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 12/06/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP(MD). No.10237 of 2023 Ranjith ... Petitioner/A1

Vs The State represented by The Inspector of Police, Keeranur Police Station, Pudukkottai District. Crime No.114 of 2023 ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.B.Jameel Arasu, Advocate For Respondent : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi, Additional Public Prosecutor

PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.439 of Cr.P.C. PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No.114 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/A1, who was arrested and remanded judicial custody on 09.04.2023 for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 336, 341, 342, 323, 302 and 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.114 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that on 07.04.2023 at about

10.30 p.m., during temple festival, the petitioner has threw the stone in the crowd place, due to which which, one Mohamed Yasin caused injuries. Thereafter, the villagers were taken to the hospital for treatment and after knowing the said incident, the deceased namely, Vigneshwaran and others were went to the hospital for seeing the said Mohamed Yasin. At that time, the petitioner and others were intercepted the deceased and there was a wordy quarrel between them. Due to which, the petitioner and others were murdered the deceased namely, Vigneshwaran. Based on the said allegation, the present case was registered against the petitioner and others.

3.Heard. Perused the materials available on record including the First Information Report.

4.It is submitted by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor that the petitioner has been detained under Act 14 of 1982.

5.Taking note of the fact that the petitioner has been detained under 14 Act of 1982, this court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

6.Hence, the petition stands dismissed. sd/- 12/06/2023 / TRUE COPY / /06/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. SJI TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KEERANUR POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT. 2 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, TRICHY. 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.10237 of 2023 Date :12/06/2023 SS/VR/19/06/2023/2P/4C

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.