VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Anthony Muthu.S.M v. The Inspector of Police

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
14 June 2023
Bench
G.K. Ilanthiraiyanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 10435/2023

Judgment

CRL OP(MD). No.10435 of 2023 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 14/06/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP(MD). No.10435 of 2023

¶1Anthony Muthu.S.M,

¶2Periyasamy,

¶3Suseela.R, ... Petitioners/Accused No.1,3&9

Vs The State rep.by, The Inspector of Police, Rajakkamangalam Police Station, Kanyakumari District. (Crime No.100 of 2023). ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.Perumal.C.T, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.100 of 2023 on the file of the Respondent Police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 294(b), 353 and 506(ii) IPC, in Crime No.100 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

¶2The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant is the Village Administrative Officer. When the defacto complainant was questioning about the encroachment made by the petitioners, they abused the defacto complainant in filthy language. Hence, the complaint. CRL OP(MD). No.10435 of 2023

¶3The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that first petitioner is having 13 previous cases and the third petitioner is having six previous cases.

¶4The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the first petitioner is a State Secretary of one political party and all the previous cases are only politically motivated, hence he seek bail.

¶5Heard. Perused the materials available on record including the First Information Report.

¶6Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and also the previous bad antecedents of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

¶7Hence the petition stands dismissed. sd/- 14/06/2023

/ TRUE COPY / /06/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. AAV TO

1.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, RAJAKKAMANGALAM POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. 2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.PERUMAL.C.T Advocate SR.No.28014(f) ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.10435 of 2023 Date :14/06/2023 RK/MMS/SAR- (19/06/2023) 2P/4C

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.