R.Thurairaj v. Kumaranesan

ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the contemnor seeks time to file his written response.

¶2However, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that the contempt petition may be closed since it arises out of an interim order and that finally, the writ petition filed by the petitioner has been allowed. If the petitioner has any grievance, he has to work out his remedy independently.

¶3The contempt petition is closed.

24.07.2023 Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No rmi

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi in W.P.(MD)No.13195 of 2022

24.07.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24.07.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN in W.P.(MD)No.13195 of 2022 R.Thurairaj ... Petitioner Vs. Kumaranesan, Pastor, Kirubasanamsabai, Midalam Village, Vadalikoodalvilai, Mela Sundavilai, Karungal Post, Kanyakumari District. (Delete the contemnor/second respondent. Suo motu implead the fifth respondent / Kumaranesan in W.P.(MD)No.13195 of 2022 as contemnor vide order dated 26.06.2023) ... Respondent Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the sole respondent / 2nd respondent in accordance with law for their willful disobedience of the order dated 24.06.2022 passed in W.M.P.(MD)No.9374 of 2022 in W.P.(MD)No. 13195 of 2022. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Sudhagar Nagaraj For Respondent : Mr.G.Justin