Philomen Jothi Prakasi v. Muthu Agencies

CMP(MD) Nos.11843, 11848 of 2023, 11953 of 2019 & 382 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16-04-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN CMP(MD) Nos.11843, 11848 of 2023, 11953 of 2019 and 382 of 2020 in REV.APLC(MD).SR.Nos.40792, 40793 of 2021, 70924 and 70965 of 2019 CMP(MD).No.11843 of 2023

¶1Philomen Jothi Prakasi

¶2Mercy Jaqueline

¶3Mary Simeon @ Mary Sampoorana

¶4Paul

¶5Daniel Joseph (Petitioners 2 to 5 rep. by their mother who is their power of attorney namely the 1st petitioner herein) (1st petitioner is recognised as the power of attorney of the petitioners 3 & 5, 4 & 2 and also permitted to prosecute the present legal proceedings on behalf of them vide court order dated 08.12.2021 made in CMP(MD)Nos.7953 to 7955 of 2021 in Rev.Aplc(MD)No.40792 of 2021) Vs

¶1Muthu Agencies, Through its Proprietor Muthu, D.No.118, Railway Station Road, Nagal Nagar, Dindigul town.

¶2Muthu

¶3Indian Bank(Main Branch), Rep. by its Manager, Dindgul Chatram Street, Mr.H.Lakshmi Shankar Mr.S.Suresh Kumar Isaac Paul for R3 Mr.M.Kannan for R2 To condone the delay of 570 days in filing of the review petition in CRP(MD)(NPD) No.2332 of 2008. CMP(MD).No.11848 of 2023

¶1Philomen Jothi Prakasi

¶2Mercy Jaqueline

¶3Mary Simeon @ Mary Sampoorana

¶4Paul

¶5Daniel Joseph (Petitioners 2 to 5 rep. by their mother who is their power of attorney namely the 1st petitioner herein) (1st petitioner is recognised as the power of attorney of the petitioners 3 & 5, 4 & 2 and also permitted to prosecute the present legal proceedings on behalf of them vide court order dated 08.12.2021 made in CMP(MD)Nos.7959 to 7961 of 2021 in Rev.Aplc(MD)No.40793 of 2021) Vs

¶1Indian Bank, Through its Manager, Dindgul Main Branch, No.9, Chatram Street, Dindigul 624 001.

¶2T.Sasikumar

¶3Dr.P.Anandan

¶4Dhanalakshmi

¶5R.Solaiappan

¶6J.Regina Mery

¶7Nagammal

¶8Durga

¶9C.Muthu

¶10The Tahsildar, Dindigul East Taluk,

¶11The District Collector, Dindigul District, Velu Nachiyar Complex, Thadikombu Road,

¶12The Inspector of Police, Dindigul Town North Police Station,

¶13The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul Town North Police Station, Mr.H.Lakshmi Shankar Mr.S.Suresh Kumar Isaac Paul for R1 Mr.M.Kannan for R9 To condone the delay of 570 days in filing of the review petition in CRP(MD)(PD).No.535 of 2017. CMP(MD)No.11953 of 2019 Indian Bank(Main Branch), Rep. by its Manager, Dindgul Chatram Street, Vs

¶1Muthu Agencies, Through its Proprietor Muthu, D.No.118, Railway Station Road, Nagal Nagar, Dindigul Town.

¶2Muthu Mr.S.Suresh Kumar Issac Paul Mr.M.Kannan To condone the delay of 397 days in filing this review petition against order dated 02.08.2018 made in CRP(MD).No.2332 of 2008. CMP(MD)No.382 of 2020 Indian Bank, Through its Manager, Dindgul Main Branch, No.9, Chatram Street, Dindigl. Vs

¶1T.Sasikumar

¶2Dr.P.Anandan

¶3Dhanalakshmi

¶4R.Solaiappan

¶5J.Regina Mery

¶6Nagammal

¶7Durga

¶8C.Muthu

¶9The Tahsildar, Dindigul East Taluk, Dindigul

¶10The District Collector, Dindigul District, Velu Nachiyar Complex, Thadikombu Road, Dindigul, Dindigul District.

¶11The Inspector of Police, Dindigul Town North Police Station,

¶13The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Mr.S.Suresh Kumar Issac Paul Mr.M.Kannan for R8 To condone the delay of 397 days in filing this review petition against order dated 02.08.2018 made in CRP(MD).No.535 of 2017. ORDER Heard Mr.H.Lakshmi Shankar, Mr.S.Suresh Kumar Issac Paul for the petitioners and Mr.M.Kannan for the respondents.

¶2These four applications seek condonation of delay to prefer the review against the common order passed in CRP(MD).No.535 of 2017 and CRP(MD).No.2332 of 2008 dated 02.08.2018.

¶3I am satisfied with the reasons given in the affidavits filed in support of these petitions. Hence, these petitions are ordered and delay is condoned.

¶4Registry is directed to number the review applications, if they are otherwise in order and list the same for admission on 28.04.2026.

¶5It is reported by Mr.M.Kannan and Mr.H.Lakshmi Shankar that auction purchaser and the original mortgagor have reached an arrangement to settle the disputes pending between them. The mortgagor has agreed to pay a sum of Rs.15,00,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Lakhs only) to the auction purchaser. Mr.M.Kannan states that the payment will be made by 24.04.2026.

¶6To report the payment, post the review applications on 28.04.2026. 16-04-2026 Lm