- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 14 June 2023
- Bench
- G.Ilangovan
- Case no.
- CRL OP(MD) 10356/2023
Judgment
O R D E R
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed for issuing direction to the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry on the complaint lodged by Parimala / 3rd respondent herein.
¶2The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this petitioner married the third respondent and it was a love affair. After the marriage, there was a misunderstanding arose between them. Now, at the instigation of the Thasildar she is making a repeated complaint before the Enquiry Officer against the petitioner.
¶3The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents police would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the third respondent against this petitioner an enquiry was undertaken and during the course of enquiry, finding that money transaction is pending between the parties, hence, they were advised to work out their remedy in the appropriate civil process and accordingly, the said complaint was closed.
¶4In view of the closure of the said complaint, nothing survives for adjudication in this petition.
¶5With the above observation, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.
14.06.2023 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No trp To
¶1The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District.
2.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Valliyur, Tirunelveli District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN. J. trp Crl.O.P.(MD)No. 10356 of 2023
14.06.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 14.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Crl.O.P.(MD)No. 10356 of 2023 Kalaiselvan ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District. 2.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Valliyur, Tirunelveli District. 3.Parimala ... Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to direct the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry on the complaint lodged by Parimala / 3rd respondent herein. For Petitioner : Mr.C. Suresh Kannan For Respondents 1 &2 : Mr.B. Nambiselvan Additional Public Prosecutor
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.