Santhana.R v. The Chief Educational Officer

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶2The petitioner alleges that her husband had committed bigamy and that disciplinary action should be taken against him. The petitioner has not arrayed her husband to the party in this writ petition. Whether to take disciplinary action against an employee or not is a matter that is left to the discretion of the employer. Now the first respondent is cognizant of the petitioner's complaint. It is for the first respondent to take a call in the matter. I am not in a position to issue any positive direction. Leaving the matter to the discretion of the first respondent, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

27.06.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To

1.The Chief Educational Officer, Office of the Chief Educational Officer, Madurai Road, Thiruchirappalli-620008.

2.The Headmaster, Musiri Boys Higher Secondary School, Musiri, Tiruchirappalli District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

27.06.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.06.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN R.Santhana ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Chief Educational Officer, Office of the Chief Educational Officer, Madurai Road, Thiruchirappalli-620008. 2.The Headmaster, Musiri Boys Higher Secondary School, Musiri, Tiruchirappalli District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to take necessary action in accordance with law and rules considering the petitioner's representation dated 09.10.2021 within a time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Narayanan For Respondents : Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar Additional Government Pleader for R1 & R2