- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 14 June 2023
- Bench
- R. Subramanian, S Justice L.Victoria Gowri
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 13875/2023
Judgment
O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.] Mr.P.Thilak Kumar, learned Government Pleader takes notice for the first respondent and Mr.A.Baskaran, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for second respondent.
¶2With the consent of both sides, the writ petition is taken up for final hearing at the admission stage itself.
¶3The grievance of the petitioner is that the impugned order of eviction has been passed relying upon the judgment of a civil court in a suit in O.S.No.982 of 2017 to which, he is not a party. We do not think that such a grievance could be entertained.
¶4Once it is found that the petitioner has encroached upon the land which is a public pathway as per revenue records, the Municipal authorities are entitled to take action under Section 182 of the Tamil Nadu District Municipalities Act, 1920, since the area in question is the town panchayat.
¶5Mr.T.S.Mohamed Mohideen, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would however contend that he is entitled to hearing before the eviction order is implemented.
¶6Even though the provisions under Section 182 of the Act do not contain any requirements, the principle of natural justice must be complied with. Hence, the impugned order will be treated as a show cause notice and the petitioner will submit his explanation within a period of fifteen (15) days from today. The authority concerned will consider the explanation and pass appropriate orders.
¶7The writ petition is disposed of with the above direction. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. [R.S.M., J.] [L.V.G., J.]
14.06.2023 NCC : No Index : No Internet : Yes
PKN To
¶1The Executive Officer, Palamedu Town Panchayath, Palamedu, Madurai District.
¶2The Tahsildar, Vadipatti, Madurai District. oR.SUBRAMANIANoo,oJo. AND oL.VICTORIAoGOWRIoo,oJo. PKN W.P.(MD)oNo.13875oofo2023
14.06.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 14.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.11709 and 11710 of 2023 R.Jeyaprakash ... Petitioner -vs- 1. The Executive Officer, Palamedu Town Panchayath, Palamedu, Madurai District. 2. The Tahsildar, Vadipatti, Madurai District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the proceedings of the 1st respondent in Na.Ka. No. 27/2022 dated 03.05.2023 and to quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.T.S.Mohamed Mohideen For Respondents : Mr.P.Thilak Kumar Government Pleader for R1 Mr.A.Baskaran Additional Government Pleader for R2
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.