VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

R.K.Narayanan v. The Inspector of Police

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
27 April 2023
Bench
S Justice R. Tharaniauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 12221/2021

Judgment

O RDER

This petition is filed to quash the F.I.R in Crime No.158 of 2021, on the file of the first respondent police.

¶2On the side of the prosecution, it is stated that already investigation was over and the charge report was filed in E-filing No.2210/2022 before the Judicial Magistrate, Thiruchendur and yet to be taken on file.

¶3The Investigating Officer is directed to re-submit the charge sheet, after rectifying the defect within a period of one month from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

¶4With the above direction, this Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is disposed of.

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No

27.04.2023 Internet : Yes/No Ls

To

¶1The Inspector of Police, Arumuganeri Police Station, Thoothukudi District.

¶2The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. R.THARANI. J. Ls

27.04.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.04.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.THARANI Crl.O.P.(MD) No.12221 of 2021 and Crl.M.P.(MD)No.6273 of 2021 R.K.Narayanan ... Petitioner/accused No.1 Vs. 1.The State represented by The Inspector of Police, Arumuganeri Police Station, Thoothukudi District. (Crime No.158 of 2021) ... 1st Respondent/Complainant 2.Sundar ... 2nd Respondent / defacto complainant PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to call for the records and quash the F.I.R in Crime No.158 of 2021, dated 17.07.2021, on the file of the first respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Suresh Kannan For Respondents : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side)for R1 : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi for R2

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.