- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 17 August 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 15371/2022
Judgment
ORDER When the writ petition is taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel appearing for petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement.
2.Permission is granted. This writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
17.08.2023 dsk To
1.The Superintending Engineer, Office of the Superintending Engineer, TANGEDCO, Ramanathapuram District.
2.The Executive Engineer, Operation and Maintenance, TANGEDO, Ramehswaram, Ramanathapuram District.
3.The Assistant / Junior Engineer, Operation and Maintenance, TANGEDCO, Rameshwaram, Ramanathapuram District.
B.PUGALENDHI, J. dsk
17.08.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 17.08.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI A.Prasath ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Superintending Engineer, Office of the Superintending Engineer, TANGEDCO, Ramanathapuram District. 2.The Executive Engineer, Operation and Maintenance, TANGEDO, Ramehswaram, Ramanathapuram District. 3.The Assistant / Junior Engineer, Operation and Maintenance, TANGEDCO, Rameshwaram, Ramanathapuram District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent to transfer the service connection number SC – 05-307-011-394 in favour of the petitioner's name on the basis of the petitioner's application dated 200053070522453 dated 14.05.2022. For petitioner : Mr.M.Prabhakaran For Respondents : Mr.S.Deenadhayalan, Standing Counsel
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.