Gnanam v. The District Registrar

ORDER The petitioner with a grievance that the document has been registered by impersonation has lodged a complaint before the authority and has filed this writ petition that his complaint has not been considered.

2.There is no representation for the petitioner.

3.A perusal of the affidavit shows that the petitioner alleges that the settlement document has been registered by impersonation. She has also made a representation dated 04.06.2022 to the 1st respondent. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 1st respondent to conduct enquiry under the provisions of the Registration Act, on the petitioner's representation and conclude the same within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

12.09.2023 DSK To The District Collector, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. dsk

12.09.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.09.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Gnanam ... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli. 2.John Wesley ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a writ of mandamus, directing the respondent to cancel the gift settlement deed dated 14.11.1978 vide document number 1424/1978 of Sub Registrar, Vallioor alleged to be executed by Ponniah Pandaram in favour of Ponnudurai with regard to the property ad measuring 90 ¼ cents in Survey No.1486/1 (New Sub Division Number 1486/1D) at Vadakku Vallioor Village, Radhapuram Taluk, Tirunelveli District by considering the petitioner's representation dated 04.06.2022. For petitioner : No representation For Respondent : Mr.M.Sarangan, No.1 Additional Government Pleader : No representation for R2