- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 6 December 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 15558/2019
Judgment
ORDER Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
¶2In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
06.12.2023 NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. ssb To
1.The Assistant Director of Town Panchayat, Collectorate, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.
2.The Executive Officer, Thengamputhoor Town Panchayat, Thengamputhoor, Kanyakumari District.
B.PUGALENDHI, J. ssb
06.12.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.12.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and W.M.P(MD).Nos.12213 and 12215 of 2019 N.Ragavan ... Petitioner versus 1.The Assistant Director of Town Panchayat, Collectorate, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. 2.The Executive Officer, Thengamputhoor Town Panchayat, Thengamputhoor, Kanyakumari District. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the retender notification dated 25.06.2019 issued by the second respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.108/2018/A1 and quash the same as illegal and consequently directing the respondents continuing the petitioner with the earlier work order issued to the petitioner by the second respondent to complete the works of "Construction of Window Platform (Compost Pad), Recovery Shed and Machinery Room at Resource Recovery Park in Thengamputhoor Town Panchayat, Kanyakumari District. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sukumar For R1 : Mr.G.Surya Anandh Additional Government Pleader For R2 : Mr.P.Aathimoolapandian
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.