- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 16 June 2023
- Bench
- R. Subramanian, S Justice L.Victoria Gowri
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 14221/2023
Judgment
O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.] Mr.C.Deepak, learned Standing Counsel, takes notice for the respondent – Bank.
¶2With the consent of both sides, this writ petition is taken up for final hearing at the admission stage itself.
¶3The petitioner's challenge is to the sale notice issued by the respondent – Bank.
¶4Mr.C.Deepak, learned counsel appearing for the bank would submit that the sale has already been held on 10.03.2023 and the sale certificate has also been issued.
¶5We do not think we can entertain this writ petition at this stage since third party rights have intervened. Hence, the writ petition stands dismissed. It will be open to the petitioner to approach the jurisdictional Debts Recovery Tribunal. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. [R.S.M., J.] [L.V.G., J.]
16.06.2023 NCC : No Index : No Internet : Yes
PKN oR.SUBRAMANIANoo,oJo. AND oL.VICTORIAoGOWRIoo,oJo. PKN W.P.(MD)oNo.14221oofo2023
16.06.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.12040 and 12041 of 2023 M/s.Nagi Engineering and Technologies Private Limited, Rep. by its Managing Director N.Paneerselvam. ... Petitioner -vs- The Authorized Officer, Canara Bank, ARM (Assets Recovery Management) Branch, Trichy District. ... Respondent PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the respondents impugned E-Auction Sale Notice dated 02.02.2023 and consequential impugned order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tiruchirappalli in Cr.M.P. No.15769/2023 dated 25.05.2023 in respect of house property in Plot No.15, Door No.30, Survey No.90/3, 91/1 an extent of 2400 Sq.fts in Puthur Village, Trichirappalli Taluk, Trichirappalli District and quash the same as devoid of merits consequently direct the respondent to give proper extension of time for OTS proposal dated 25.03.2022 and to permit the petitioner to settle the matter as per the said OTS. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Haja Mohideen For Respondent : Mr.C.Deepak
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.