Paripoorana Mariya Nesan v. The Commissioner

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶2The petitioner is working as BT Assistant in Adi Dravidar Higher Secondary School, Pudukottai District. The charge memo was issued against the petitioner on 06.03.2019. The grievance of the petitioner is that on account of the pendency of the disciplinary action, he is not being considered for promotion.

¶3The grievance of the petitioner is justified. The first respondent is directed to conclude the disciplinary action and pass final order on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. All the contentions of the petitioner are left open.

¶4The Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

20.06.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To

1.The Commissioner, Adi Dravidar Welfare Department, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005.

2.The District Adi Dravidar & Tribal Welfare Officer, Pudukkottai District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

20.06.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.06.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Paripoorana Mariya Nesan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner, Adi Dravidar Welfare Department, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005. 2.The District Adi Dravidar & Tribal Welfare Officer, Pudukkottai District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the first respondent to conclude the disciplinary proceedings in pursuance of the charge memo in Na.Ka.No.02/20544/2019, dated 06.03.2019 issued against the petitioner and pass final order within a time frame as fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Gowrishankar For Respondents : Mr.G.Suriyananth Additional Government Pleader