VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Charles v. The Inspector of Police

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
26 June 2023
Bench
G.K. Ilanthiraiyanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 10989/2023

Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 26/06/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP(MD). No.10989 of 2023 Charles ... Petitioner/2nd Accused

Vs The State represented by The Inspector of Police, Thoothukudi South Police Station, Thoothukudi District. Crime No.397 of 2022 ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.Saravana Kumar R, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.T.Senthilkumar, Additional Public Prosecutor

PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.439 of Cr.P.C. PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No.397 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/A2 who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 04.06.2022 for the offences punishable under Sections 8

(C) r/w 20(b),(ii)(B), 28 and 29(1) of NDPS Act, 1985 @ 8(C) r/w 20

(b), (ii)(C), 29(1) of NDPS Act, 1985 in Crime No.397 of 2022, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner and other accused were found in illegal possession of 5kgs of Ganja Oil. Hence, the case.

3.Heard. Perused the materials available on record including the First Information Report.

4.It is seen that there are totally five accused involved in this case and the petitioner is arrayed as A2. Even as per the case of the prosecution, A1 to A3 were found in possession of contraband weighing 5kgs of Ganja Oil. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner was arrested subsequently, namely, after arrest of the first accused and the petitioner has not possessed in any contraband as alleged by the prosecution, whereas, on perusal of documents revealed that the petitioner along with A1 and A3 were found in possession of contraband weighing 5kgs of Ganja Oil. It is a commercial quantity. That apart, the petitioner has failed to satisfy the twin conditions as contemplated under Section 37 of the NDPS Act.

5.Taking into consideration the seriousness and gravity of the offence, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. sd/- 26/06/2023 / TRUE COPY / /07/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. SJI TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THOOTHUKUDI SOUTH POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT. 2 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, PALAYAMKOTTAI. 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.10989 of 2023 Date :26/06/2023 SS/06/07/2023/2P/4C

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.