Palpranavanathan v. The Sub Collector

ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶2In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

21.07.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. To

¶1The Sub Collector, Periyakulam, Theni District.

¶2The Revenue Divisional Officer, Theni.

¶3The Tahsildar, Theni Taluk, Theni District.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. ogy

21.07.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.07.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and W.M.P.(MD)No.11384 of 2022 Palpranavanathan ... Petitioner versus 1. The Sub Collector, Periyakulam, Theni District. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Theni. 3. The Tahsildar, Theni Taluk, Theni District. 4. Jeevanatham 5. Saravankumar ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the impugned order passed by the first respondent in Na.Ka.No. 2482/2020/A1 dated 20.04.2022 and quash the same as illegal and arbitrary. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Senthil Kumar For R1 to R3 : Mr.P.T.Thiraviam, Government Advocate For R4 and R5 : Mr.B.Pandia Raj