VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

P.Palanisamy v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
3 October 2023
Bench
S.M. Subramaniamauthor, V. Lakshminarayanan
Case no.
WP(MD) 16975/2019

Judgment

O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.] The petitioner seeks for removal of encroachment made by the third respondent in Survey No.580/1 of Sirumalai Village, Thalakadai, Dindigul East Taluk, Dindigul District.

¶2Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, learned Additional Government Pleader, appearing for the respondents 1 & 2, on instructions, submitted that pursuant to the earlier order of this Court, dated

31.08.2023, the encroachment in Survey No.580/1, which had been made by the third respondent by way of fencing, has been removed and possession of the said land has also been taken over by the Forest Department.

¶3As the relief sought for by the petitioner having been granted, nothing survives for adjudication and the writ petition is therefore dismissed. No costs.

[S.M.S., J.] [V.L.N., J.]

03.10.2023 NCC : Index : Internet :

krk To:

1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Dindigul Division, Dindigul District.

2.The Thasildar, Dindigul East Taluk, Dindigul, Dindigul District.

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. and V . LAKSHMINARAYANAN , J . krk

03.10.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 03.10.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN P.Palanisamy ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer Dindigul Division Dindigul District 2.The Thasildar Dindigul East Taluk Dindigul, Dindigul District 3.Natchan ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to remove the encroachment made in the land situated in Survey No.580/1 (Revenue Promboke) in Sirumalai Village, Thalakadai Dindigul East Taluk, Dindigul District, by the third respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sarvaganprabhu For Respondents : Mr.N.Sathish Kumar Additional Government Pleader for R1 & R2

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.