- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 6 May 2026
- Bench
- S Justice S.Srimathy
- Case no.
- CRL OP(MD) 9096/2026
Judgment
ORDER
The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 126, 118(1), 351(2) of BNS, in Crime No.47 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.
¶2The case of the prosecution is that due to land dispute, there was wordy altercation between the petitioners and the defacto complainant and there was physical assault by the accused. Hence, the complaint.
¶3The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioners are ready and willing to abide by any conditions which may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he seeks anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
¶4The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that injured person has been discharged from the hospital and there is no previous case as against the petitioners. However, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
¶5Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, subject to certain conditions.
6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, on condition that each of the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruchili, Virudhunagar, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy is made ready and on further conditions that: [a]the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police at 10.30 a.m for a period of one week and thereafter as and when required; [c]the petitioners shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [d]the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [e]On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners are released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]; [f]If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS.
06.05.2026 CM TO
¶1Inspector of Police, Veeracholan Police Station, Virudhunagar District. (Crime No.47 of 2026).
2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
3.The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruchili, Virudhunagar. S.SRIMATHY,J CM ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.9096 of 2026 Date : 06/05/2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 06/05/2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY 1. Aboobacker Siddiqe 2. Mohamed Mustafa ... Petitioners Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police, Veeracholan Police Station, Virudhunagar District. (Crime No.47 of 2026). ... Respondent PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.47 of 2026 on the file of the respondent Police. For Petitioners : Mr.S.M.A.Jinnah For Respondent : Mr.A.S.Abdul Kallam Azad Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.