VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

The Correspondent v. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Its Secretary

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
28 January 2026
Bench
B.Pugalendhiauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 14645/2023

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner Management has filed this writ petition as against the order of deployment of the 6th respondent to their school.

¶2Today, when this writ petition is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1 to 5 submits that the petitioner Management has raised objections as against the order of deployment of the 6th respondent, since they have appointed one A.Johnson in the existing vacancy. They have also filed another writ petition before this Court in W.P.(MD)No.25100 of 2024 as against the return of proposal made by them for approval of the appointment of Johnson and this Court, by order dated 14.10.2025, disposed of the writ petition with certain directions as under: "a) The respondents shall grant in-principle approval of the proposal sent by the petitioner for the appointment of the BT Assistant (Science) namely A.Johnson. b) Such approval shall be subject to the orders to be made by the Hon'ble Apex Court. c) On grant of approval, the petitioner would be entitled for the sanctioned salary from the date of this order and if the qualification is held in favour of the petitioner by the Hon'ble Apex Court, then the approval should revert back to the date of appointment of the said BT Assistant teacher and the arrears of salary from the date of appointment till the date of this order shall be paid by the respondents, within a period of four (4) weeks of the order passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court." In view of the same, nothing survives in this writ petition.

¶3Recording the submissions of the learned Government Advocate, this writ petition is closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

28.01.2026 ogy Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. NCC : Yes / No. To

¶1The Secretary, Department of School Education, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.

¶2The Director of School Education, College Road, Chennai – 600 006.

¶3The Chief Educational Officer, Trichy, Trichy District.

¶4The District Educational Officer, Trichy, Trichy District.

¶5The Correspondent, R.C.Higher Secondary School, Contonment, Trichy.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. ogy

WP(MD) No.14645 of 2023

28.01.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 28.01.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI WP(MD)No.14645 of 2023 and WMP(MD)Nos.12366 and 12367 of 2023 and 3020 of 2024 The Correspondent, St. Joseph's College Higher Secondary School, Near Chatram Bus Stand, Trichy District – 620 002. ... Petitioner Vs 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Department of School Education, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009. 2. The Director of School Education, College Road, Chennai – 600 006. 3. The Chief Educational Officer, Trichy, Trichy District. 4. The District Educational Officer, Trichy, Trichy District. 5. The Correspondent, R.C.Higher Secondary School, Contonment, Trichy. 6. A.Saveriar, B.T.Assistant (Science) R.C.Higher Secondary School, Contonment, Trichy. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the impugned proceedings of the 3rd respondent CEO in Na.Ka.No.7300/Aa4/2022 dated 09.06.2023 and quash the same as illegal and void. For Petitioner : M/s.M.F.Rooshi Maas for M/s.Isaac Chambers For R1 to R5 : Mr.S.Vinodh, Government Advocate

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.