Amsaveni.R v. The District Collector

O R D E R The petitioner has filed this writ petition for extension of lease by referring the Covid-19 situation.

¶2When the writ petition is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner.

¶3The petitioner is not entitled to seek for any extension after the period of lease is over.

¶4Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs.

NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No.

15.09.2023 Internet:Yes am To

1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai.

2.The Deputy Director, Geology and Mines Department, Madurai.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. am

15.09.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 15.09.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI W.P(MD)No.15991 of 2022 R.Amsaveni ... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The Deputy Director, Geology and Mines Department, Madurai. ...Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to extend the period of licence granted by the first respondent under proceedings in Na.Ka.No.1634/2015-A Mineral dated 28.11.2016 for the period in which the petitioner was prevented from quarrying. For Petitioner :No appearance For Respondents :Mr.M.Sarangan Additional Government Pleader