VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Thetsnamoorthi @ Thatchanamoorthi v. State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police, Chokkampatti

GRANTED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
6 May 2026
Bench
S Justice S.Srimathyauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 9234/2026

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner/sole accused, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 115(2) and 351(3) of BNS, in connection with the case in Crime No.78 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶2The case of the prosecution is that on

29.04.2026 at about 8.30 p.m., when the petitioner was walking in front of the defacto complainant's house, his dog barked at the petitioner. Enraged over the same, the petitioner abused the defacto complainant in filthy language. When the same was questioned by the defacto complainant, the petitioner said to have attacked him with a stick and threatened him with dire consequences.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that it is a case and counter and the petitioner is ready and willing to abide by any conditions which may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he seeks anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶4The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that in the alleged occurrence, the defacto complainant has suffered simple injury. Apart from this case, the petitioner is having one previous case. Therefore, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶5Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to certain conditions.

¶6Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Tenkasi, Tenkasi District, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy is made ready and on further conditions that: [a]the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. [c]the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [d]the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [e]On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner is released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]; [f]If

the

accused

thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS.

06.05.2026 ogy To

¶1The Judicial Magistrate Court, Tenkasi, Tenkasi District.

¶2The Inspector of Police, Chokkampatti Police Station, Tenkasi District.

¶3The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. S.SRIMATHY,J. ogy

ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.9234 of 2026 Date : 06/05/2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 06/05/2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY Thetsanamoorthi @ Thatchanamoorthi ... Petitioner/ Sole Accused Vs State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by The Inspector of Police, Chokkampatti Police Station, Tenkasi District. ... Respondent PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER : For Anticipatory Bail in Cr.No.78 of 2026 on the file of the Respondent Police. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Santhanam Rajesh Kumar For Respondent : Mr.A.S.Abul Kalaam Azad, Government Advocate (Crl. side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.