Maventhan @ Attu v. State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police, Kallakudi

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 07.05.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY CRL OP(MD). No.9242 of 2026 Maventhan @ Attu ... Petitioner/Accused Rank not Known

Vs The State of Tamil Nadu Rep.By, the Inspector of Police, Kallakudi Police Station, Trichy District. (Crime No.53 of 2026) .. Respondent/Complainant

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Mohanasundaram For Respondent: Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabhahar

Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.53 of 2026 on the file of the Respondent Police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b) and 109 of BNS 2023, in Crime No.53 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶2The case of the prosecution is that on

01.04.2026, the accused persons allegedly took the defacto complainant's son on a two-wheeler, after which he went missing. When the defacto complainant searched for her son, she was unable to trace his whereabouts. Subsequently, the defacto complainant's son was found admitted in a hospital with injuries on his head and other parts of the body. Hence, the complaint was lodged.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to abide by any conditions which may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he seeks anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶4The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the injured person has been discharged from the hospital and there is no previous case pending against the petitioner. However, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶5Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Lalgudi, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy is made ready and on further conditions that: [a]the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at

10.30 am., until further orders; [c]the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [d]the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [e]On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner is released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]; [f]If

the

accused

thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS.

07.05.2026 Rmk To

1.The Judicial Magistrate, Lalgudi.

2.The Inspector of Police, Kallakudi Police Station, Trichy District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

S.SRIMATHY, J. Rmk CRL OP(MD). No.9242 of 2026

07.05.2026