- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 20 June 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 14507/2023
Judgment
ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.
¶2The petitioners herein are retired employees of the respondent corporation. It appears that they are eligible to be paid some amount under what is known as Post Retirement Benefit Scheme. The petitioners have given individual representations. They shall be considered by the respondent within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and the eligible amount shall be disbursed together with interest at the rate of 6% from the date on which the amount is due to the respective petitioners herein.
¶3With this direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.
20.06.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi
20.06.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.06.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN 1.V.Duraisamy 2.A.Manavalan 3.A.Arputhasamy 4.K.Abdul Kasim 5.S.Govindaraj ... Petitioners Vs. The State Express Transport Corporation (Tamil Nadu) Ltd., Represented by its Managing Director, Pallavan Salai, Chennai. ... Respondent Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent to forthwith refund the Post Retirement Benefit Scheme contribution to the petitioners together with interest at the rate of 6% per annum payable to the petitioners from the date of their retirement to till the date on which the said benefits are paid to them. For Petitioners : Mr.A.Rahul For Respondents : Mr.K.Senthilkumar
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.