VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Thillaiyambalam v. State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police, M.Chatrapatti

GRANTED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
7 May 2026
Bench
S Justice S.Srimathyauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 9394/2026

Judgment

ORDER The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 296(b), 115(2), 351(2) and 303(1) of BNS, 2023 in Crime No.37 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

¶2The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity the petitioners herein are said to have attacked the defacto complainant and also threatened him with dire consequences in drunken mood. Hence, the complaint.

¶3The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the petitioners are having 11, 3, 1 and 1 previous cases respectively and the injured has been discharged from the hospital.

¶4Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police.

¶5Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, subject to certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.V, Madurai, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy is made ready and on further conditions that: [a] the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioners shall appear before the respondent Police daily at 10.00 am and 5.00 pm until further orders. [c] the petitioners shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [d]the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [e]On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners are released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f]If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS.

07.05.2026 TRP TO

¶1Judicial Magistrate No.V, Madurai,

¶2Inspector of Police, M.Chatrapatti Police Station, Madurai District.

¶3The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. S.SRIMATHY,J TRP ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.9394 of 2026 Date : 07/05/2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 07/05/2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY 1. Thillaiyambalam 2. Satheeshkumar 3. Varadharaj 4.Meganthan ... Petitioners Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police, M.Chatrapatti Police Station, Madurai District. Crime No.37 of 2026. ... Respondent PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.37 of 2026 on the file of the Respondent Police. For Petitioners : Mr. T.Sathish Kumar, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar, Additional Public Prosecutor

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.