VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Jesus Power Revival Agro Sugar v. The Authorized Officer

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
21 June 2023
Bench
R. Subramanian, S Justice L.Victoria Gowri
Case no.
WP(MD) 14768/2023

Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.12451, 12452, 12453 and 10541 of 2023 W.P.(MD) No.14768 of 2023

1.Jesus Power Revival Agro Sugar A Partnership Firm, No.4/310, Upstair, Kalaignar Nagar, Periyakulam 625 601, Theni District.

2.N.Navaneetha Krishnan

3.Mariya Selvi (Partner)

¶4N.Chandrasekaran (Partner)

... Petitioners -vs-The Authorized Officer, Canara Bank, Periyakulam Branch, Theni District. ... Respondent

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned E-Action sale Notice in Ref. 285/10268/755/25/170001458203 dated 05.06.2023 issued by the respondent, quash the same and consequently direct the respondent herein to make viability study and offer rehabilitation package to the petitioner a registrant under the Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Industry. W.P.(MD) No.12441 of 2023 Jesus Power Revival Agro Sugar A Partnership Firm, No.4/310, Upstair, Kalaignar Nagar, Periyakulam 625 601, Theni District. Rep. by its Partnership N.Chandrasekaran ... Petitioner -vs-The Authorized Officer, Canara Bank, Periyakulam Branch, Theni District. ... Respondent PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned demand notice in Ref. 1017285010268 / 1017755000025 / 170001458203 dated

09.03.2023 issued under Sec.13(2) of the SARFAESI Act and the consequent impugned possession notice dated 15.05.2023 under Sec.13(4) of the SARFAESI Act, quash the same and consequently direct the respondent herein to allow the petitioner to make payment of loan amount in installments on re-schedulement of loan amount on the basis of fresh statement of accounts as per with agreed rate of interest. For Petitioners : Mr.Thalai Mutharasu for Mr.K.Appadurai (in both writ petitions) For Respondent : Mr.R.Pandivel (in both writ petitions) COMMON ORDER [Order of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.] In view of the fact that the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Madurai, is not manned, we are entertaining these writ petitions.

¶2Mr.R.Pandivel, learned Standing Counsel, takes notice for the respondent – Bank.

¶3With the consent of both sides, these writ petitions are taken up for final hearing at the admission stage itself.

¶4The petitioners' challenge is to the sale notice dated 05.06.2023 as well as the possession notice dated 15.05.2023, issued by the respondent – Bank.

¶5The outstanding as of now is Rs.1,29,70,379/- (Rupees One Crore Twenty Nine Lakhs Seventy Thousand Three Hundred and Seventy Nine only). The petitioner has also challenged the possession notice in W.P.(MD) No.12441 of 2023.

¶6The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that they would be able to liquidate the entire debt if they are given some time.

¶7Considering the said statement and the fact that the business of the petitioners had suffered due to the lockdown imposed, these writ petitions are disposed of with the following directions:

(i) The Bank will not proceed with the sale or taking possesion, if the petitioners pay a sum of Rs.25,70,379/- (Rupees Twenty Five Lakhs Seventy Thousand Three Hundred and Seventy Nine only) to the respondent – Bank, on or before 06.07.2023.

(ii) The remaining amount of Rs.1,04,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore and Four Lakhs only) shall be paid by the petitioners in six equated monthly installments commencing from 06th August, 2023. The monthly installments shall be paid on or before 06th of every succeeding month.

(iii) The interest that accrues in the interregnum and the cost of the sale shall be paid along with the last installment.

(iv) If there is a default in payment as directed above, the respondent – Bank can proceed with the sale as well to take possession pursuant to the order dated

05.06.2023. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. [R.S.M., J.] [L.V.G., J.]

21.06.2023 NCC : No Index : No Internet : Yes

PKN oR.SUBRAMANIANoo,oJo. AND oL.VICTORIAoGOWRIoo,oJo. PKN W.P.(MD)oNos.14768oando12441oofo 2023

21.06.2023

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.