- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 12 July 2023
- Bench
- D.Nagarjun
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 14826/2023
Judgment
O R D E R This petition is filed for a direction to the second respondent police not to harass the petitioner under the guise of inquiry on a Complaint lodged by the defacto complainant by considering the representation of the petitioner dated 29.05.2023.
¶2Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents police submits that the police have made inquiry and on the basis of the representation of the defacto complainant dated 29.05.2023 and the said representation was ultimately closed on 29.06.2023. It is also submitted that subsequent to the closure of the representation on
29.06.2023, the police did not seek presence of the petitioner and that the presence of the petitioner is no longer required in respect of the representation dated 29.05.2023 given by defacto complainant.
¶3Recording the above submissions, no further orders are required to be passed in this petition and therefore, this petition is closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
12.07.2023 NCC : Index : Internet : PKN To
¶1The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District.
¶2The Inspector of Police, Thisaiyanvilai Police Station, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. DR.D.NAGARJUN,J PKN W.P.(MD)No.14826 of 2023 Dated:12.07.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:12.07.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN W.P.(MD)No.14826 of 2023 and W.M.P.(MD) No.12513 of 2023 Kalaiselvan ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District. 2. The Inspector of Police, Thisaiyanvilai Police Station, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District. 3. Parimala ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus direct the 2nd Respondent herein not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry on the Complaint lodged by Parimala / 3rd Respondent herein, and by considering petitioner representation dated 29.05.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Suresh Kannan For R1 and R2 : Mr.SS.Madhavan Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.