- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 1 March 2023
- Bench
- P.D.Audikesavalu
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 16263/2020
Judgment
ORDER Learned Standing Counsel for the Fourth Respondent has filed Counter-Affidavit.
¶2Though the matter has been posted under the caption 'for dismissal', there was no representation for the Petitioner when the matter was called at
11.40 p.m, today, apart from the earlier hearing on 23.02.2023. In such circumstances, there does not appear to be any useful purpose being served in keeping the Writ Petition pending indefinitely when the Petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the same. In fine, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. It is made clear that the Petitioner is not precluded from applying for revival of the Writ Petition, if necessary, in accordance with law. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.
01.03.2023 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No ta Note:- Issue order copy by 03.03.2023. To
1.The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Board, Chennai.
2.The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Board, Madurai.
3.The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Board, Madurai. Copy to: M.Navaneethakrishnan, S/o.Manickam, 4/244, Ramakrishnan Street, EB Colony, Iyer Bungalow, Madurai-17. P.D.AUDIKESAVALU,J. ta
01.03.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 01.03.2023 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU and W.M.P. (MD) No. 13594 of 2020 M.Navaneethakrishnan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Board, Chennai. 2.The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Board, Madurai. 3.The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Board, Madurai. 4.The Executive Officer, A/m.Vinayagar Veerabathra Swami Thirukovil, Samayanallur, Madurai North Taluk, Madurai. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the impugned order of the fourth respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to hand over the possession in both the S.Nos.54/2A & 102/7C2 as per the rental agreements dated 05.09.2019 and 24.09.2019 respectively. For Petitioner : No Appearance For R1 to R3 : Mr. P.Subbaraj Special Government Pleader For R4 : Mr. S.Manohar Standing Counsel
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.