- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 2 June 2026
- Bench
- P.Dhanabal
- Case no.
- CRL OP(MD) 9633/2026
Judgment
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 02.06.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL CRL OP(MD). No. 9633 of 2026 Akash Manivannan ... Petitioner
Vs State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Inspector of Police, Thiruneelakudi Police Station, Thanjavur District. (Crime No.347 of 2026)
...Respondents/Complainant
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Surya
Advocate.
For Respondent : Mr.G.Ganesh Kumar Government Advocate (Crl. side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :-For Anticipatory Bail in Cr.No. 347 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :-
The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 109 & 351(3) of BNS, in Crime No.347 of 2026, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
¶2The case of the prosecution is that during the temple festival there was wordy quarrel between the parties. In which the petitioner along with other accused made assault upon the defacto complainant. In which, he sustained injuries. Hence, the complaint.
¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he was falsely implicated in this case and he is no way connected in the above said incident. He has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. With an intention to harass the petitioner the present case has been foisted by the defacto complainant. Hence, he prays to grant Anticipatory Bail to the petitioner.
¶4The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submits that the offences are grave in nature. Due to the previous dispute regarding the temple festival, the petitioner assaulted the defacto complainant. He sustained injuries and admitted in the hospital. After taking treatment, the injured was discharged from the hospital. There is no previous case pending against the petitioner. He opposed the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
¶5Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.
¶6Considering the rival submissions on either side and the nature of offences charged against the petitioner, the injured was discharged from the hospital, co-accused were already released on bail, the petitioner has no previous case against him and considering all other facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions: [a] Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on anticipatory bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudhur, and on further conditions that: [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders; [c] the petitioner shall not commit any offences of similar nature. [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [e] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.
(P D B J)
02.06.2026 TM To
1.The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudhur.
2.The Inspector of Police, Thiruneelakudi Police Station, Thanjavur District. (Crime No.347 of 2026)
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
P. DHANABAL, J. TM ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No. 9633 of 2026 Date : 02.06.2026
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.