VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

S.Raman v. Thiru.Arumugam

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
1 September 2023
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor
Case no.
CONT P(MD) 1242/2023

Judgment

O R D E R Heard learned counsel on either side.

2.I am satisfied that the order passed by this Court has been complied with. Hence, this contempt petition is closed.

01.09.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ias Cont.P.(MD)No.1242 of 2023 in W.P.(MD)No.24038 of 2022

01.09.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.09.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Cont.P.(MD)No.1242 of 2023 in W.P.(MD)No.24038 of 2022 S.Raman ... Petitioner Vs. 1.Arumugam, Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Ltd., Madurai Division, Bye Pass Road, Madurai - 625 016. 2.Raghavan, General Manager,Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Ltd., Madurai Division, Bye Pass Road, Madurai - 625 016. 3.Bhama, Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Employees Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar Illam, Pallavan Salai, Chennai - 600 002. ... Respondents Prayer: Contempt petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to commit and punish the contemnors/ respondents for their willful disobedience of the order of this Court in WP(MD).No.24038 of 2022 dated 19-10-2022. For Petitioner : Mr.A.K.Thangavelu For Respondents : Mr.S.C.Herold Singh, Standing Counsel.

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.