VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Chandrasekaran. Vr v. The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Limited

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
23 June 2023
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 15037/2023

Judgment

O R D E R Heard the learned counsel on either side.

2.The writ petitioner joined the respondent corporation as Driver in the year 1987. He retired from service on 31.07.2022. However, his terminal benefits were settled only on 29.05.2023.

3.It is well settled that for such belated settlement, the retired employee is entitled to interest. I, therefore, direct the respondent Corporation to pay the interest to the writ petitioner computed at the rate of 6% per annum on the belated disbursement from the date of retirement till date of settlement. The interest amount shall be paid within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

4.This writ petition is allowed accordingly. No costs.

23.06.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No ias G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J. ias

23.06.2023 (2/4)

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 23.06.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN V.R.Chandrasekaran ... Petitioner Vs. 1.Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (KMB) Ltd., Rep. by its Managing Director, Kumbakonam – 612 001. 2.The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (KMB) Ltd., Trichy Region, Trichy – 620 001. 3.The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (KMB) Ltd., Karur Region, Karur – 620 001. 4.The Chief Financial Officer, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (KMB) Ltd., Kumbakonam – 612 001. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to pay interest at the rate of 18% per annum for the belated payment of retirement benefits including Provident Fund and Leave encashment and 1998 ML encashment within the time limit that may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Senthilkumar For Respondents : Mr.K.Ramaiah, Standing Counsel.

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.