Periyasamy v. Raj Kumar

O R D E R

This contempt petition is filed that the order of this Court in WP(MD) No.1188 of 2022, dated 25.01.2022 has not been complied with.

2.Today(25.07.2023), when this Contempt Petition is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not properly instructed him. He further submits that a Review application has been filed by one Koman in Review Appl No.41 of 2022 in WP(MD) No.1188 of 2022 and the same was allowed by this Court on 06.04.2023.

3.In view of the subsequent development, this contempt petition is closed.

25.07.2023 NCC: Yes/No

Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No vrn To

1.The Tahsildar Taluk Office, Sivakasi Taluk,

2.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Sivakasi Taluk,

3.The Commissioner, Sivakasi Municipal Corporation,

4.The Commissioner, Sivakasi Municipal Corporation, CONT.P.(MD)No.1354  of 2023 B.PUGALENDHI,oJ. vrn Orderomadeoin CONT.P.(MD)No.1354oofo2023 in W.P(MD)oNo.1188oofo2023

25.07.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25.07.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI CONT.P.(MD)No.1354 of 2023 in W.P(MD) No.1188 of 2023 P.Periyasamy Managing Trustee of Bathirakaliamman Mariamman Religious and Charitable Trust, S/o Periyasamy, No.16/36 Murugan colony, Naranapuram Road, Virudhunagar District – 626 109. ...Petitioner/Petitioner Vs. 1.Rajkumar The Tahsildar Taluk Office, Sivakasi Taluk, 2.Loganathan, The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Sivakasi Taluk, 3.Krishna Moorthy, The Commissioner, Sivakasi Municipal Corporation, 4.M.Sankaran, The Commissioner, Sivakasi Municipal Corporation, ...Contemnors/Respondents PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the contemnors/respondents under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for their wilful and deliberate disobedience of the order dated 25.01.2022 made in WP(MD) No.1188 of 2022 of this Court. For Petitioner :Mr.J.Priscilla Pandian For Respondents :Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh, Additional Government Pleader