VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Sivasakthi v. The State of Tamil Nadu

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
27 May 2026
Bench
A.D.Jagadish Chandiraauthor, P.Vadamalai
Case no.
HCP(MD) 684/2026

Judgment

ORDER (Order of the Court was made by A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.) This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents therein to produce the person/body of the petitioner's husband, namely Sakthi, aged about 35 years, S/o. Chandran, the detenue herein, before this Hon'ble Court and set him at liberty.

¶2Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Counsel appearing for the State.

¶3When the matter was taken up for hearing, Mr. T.Lenin Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the State of Tamil Nadu, submitted that, based on a complaint given by the petitioner, a case in Crime No.95 of 2025 had been registered. During the course of inquiry, it came to light that the detenu/alleged missing person had borrowed money from several persons and in order to evade repayment, he is hiding himself after giving the complaint.

¶4From the facts this Court finds that this Habeas Corpus Petition is in respect of person who is simply missing and not under unlawful detention. Unlawful detention is sine qua non for issuance of Writ of Habeas Corpus.

¶5The Division Bench of this Court in H.C.P.(MD) Nos.793 and 658 of 2025 has relied the following orders: a) Simmi Bai .vs. Shrimaan Police Mahanirishak Mahodaya and others (2025 SCC OnLine MP 893) b) H.C.P.No.2191 of 2017 (Kalaiarasi vs. State) dated 7.5.2018 c) K.Sukumari vs. The Superintendent of Police (Crl.O.P.(MD) No. 19255 of 2016 dated 18.9.2018) has held that Habeus Corpus Petition in respect of missing person whose detention is not stated to be unlawful/illegal is not maintainable.

¶6In view of the above, this Habeas Corpus Petition stands disposed of with a direction to respondents 1 and 2 to effectively pursue the investigation for tracing the missing person in the present case. Accordingly, the investigating officer shall continue the investigation and take all necessary steps to trace the missing persons.

[A.D.J.C., J.] [P.V.M., J.]

27.05.2026 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No : Yes/No PKN To

¶1The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep By, The Superintendent of Police, O/o.The Superintendent of Police,

¶2The Deputy Superintendent of Police, O/o.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Paramakudi,

¶3The Inspector of Police, Nainarkovil Police Station, Paramakudi Circle,

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA ,J. AND P.VADAMALAI,J. PKN

H.C.P.(MD)No.684 of 2026

27.05.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.05.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VADAMALAI H.C.P.(MD)No.684 of 2026 Sivasakthi .. Petitioner / wife of the detenu Vs. 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep By, The Superintendent of Police, O/o.The Superintendent of Police, 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, O/o.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Paramakudi, 3. The Inspector of Police, Nainarkovil Police Station, Paramakudi Circle, .. Respondents Prayer :Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to secure and produce the person or body of the petitioner's husband Sakthi, aged about 35 years, S/o.Chandran, the detenue herein before this Hon'ble Court and set him at liberty. For Petitioner : Mr. R.Murugan For R1 to R3 : Mr.T.Lenin Kumar Additional Public Prosecutor

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.