VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Vaigundam.P v. The District Collector

WITHDRAWN DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
8 December 2023
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 16796/2022

Judgment

ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition.

¶2In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

08.12.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To

1.The District Collector, Office of the District Collector,

2.The Tahsildar, Thisayanvilai Taluk,

3.The Divisional Engineer, Highway Department, Construction and Maintenance, Tirunelveli Division, Palayamkottai,

4.The Executive Engineer, Water Resources Department, Chittar Basin Division, Tenkasi District.

5.The Assistant Engineer, Distribution/Rural, Tamilnadu Electricity Board, Thisaiyan Villai,

6.The Block Development Officer, Radhapuram Union,

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi W.P(MD)No.16796 of 2023

08.12.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 08.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P.(MD)No.17782 of 2022 P.Vaigundam ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, 2.The Tahsildar, Thisayanvilai Taluk, 3.The Divisional Engineer, Highway Department, Construction and Maintenance, Tirunelveli Division, Palayamkottai, 4.The Executive Engineer, Water Resources Department, Chittar Basin Division, Tenkasi District. 5.The Assistant Engineer, Distribution/Rural, Tamilnadu Electricity Board, Thisaiyan Villai, 6.The Block Development Officer, Radhapuram Union, 7.V.Chelladurai ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned order made by the 3rd respondent herein is his proceedings in Letter No. 2495/2021/Road Cutting N.O.C/V2 dated 01.07.2022 and quash the same as illegal and forbearing the Respondents 1 to 5 from in any manner permitting the 7th Respondent to lay down the underground pipeline between the two parcels of his lands in Urumankulam Village Survey No. 576/1A and Thinaikaran Village Survey No. 646/3. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Rajarajan For Respondents : Mr.C.Satheesh Government Advocate for R1 to R6 : Mr.R.Alagumani for R7

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.