VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Rajesh v. The State of Tamilnadu

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
18 June 2026
Bench
R.Vijayakumarauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 10107/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow R.Vijayakumar

Judgment

ORDER The present petition has been filed by a life convict in S.C.No.44 of 2007 on the file of the Principal Sessions Court, Thanjavur, seeking a direction to the first respondent to grant benefit of set off, of the remand period already undergone by the petitioner during the trial.

¶2The petitioner herein was convicted in S.C.No.44 of 2007 on the file of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Thanjavur, on 14.03.2008 and imposed with death sentence. The petitioner herein had preferred Crl.A(MD) No.155 of 2008, which was tagged along with referred trial R.T.No.1 of 2008. This Court, by an order dated 25.04.2008, after confirming the conviction had modified the punishment to one of life imprisonment.

¶3According to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the petitioner was an under trial prisoner for the period between 08.04.2006 and

13.03.2008 for 706 days. A Certificate to the said effect has been produced by the petitioner, which was issued by the Office of the Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Trichy, on 15.05.2026.

¶4The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner relying upon Section 428 of Cr.P.C, had contended that the period spent by him during the remand period has to be set off.

¶5Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the materials available on record.

¶6It could be seen from the Certificate issued by the Office of the Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Trichy, on 15.05.2026 that the period of remand during investigation of the petitioner was between

08.04.2006 and 13.03.2008 (706 days).

¶7In such circumstances, this Court is of the considered opinion that the said 706 days could be set off. Accordingly, there shall be a direction to the first respondent herein to confer the benefits of set off, of the remand period which was already undergone by the petitioner.

¶8In such view of the matter, the prayer sought for by the petitioner stands allowed. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed.

18.06.2026 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No ebsi To

¶1The Principal Sessions Judge, Thanjavur.

¶2The Superintendent of Prison Central Prison, Trichy – 20.

¶3The Inspector of Police, Kabisthalam Police Station, Thanjavur District.

¶4The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. R.VIJAYAKUMAR,J. ebsi

18.06.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 18.06.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR Rajesh ...Petitioner/Life Convict Vs 1. The Superintendent of Prison Central Prison, Trichy – 20. 2. State of Tamil Nadu Represented by The Inspector of Police, Kabisthalam Police Station, Thanjavur District. Crime No.57 of 2006 ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, to direct the first respondent to grant the benefit of set off the remand period already undergone by the petitioner from 08.04.2006 to 13.03.2008 (706 days) under Section 428 of Cr.P.C Corresponding to Section 468 of BNSS, during the trial of S.C.No.44 of 2007 on the file of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Thanjavur. For Petitioner : Mr.K.A.S.Prabhu For Respondents : Mr.P.Samuel Gunasingh Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.